Tool & Vendor Comparison Builder · governed release 03

Compare options without letting the shiny parts erase the hard questions.

Frame one bounded decision, compare the current process with two candidates, preserve the evidence behind each judgment, and keep unresolved privacy, security, accessibility, verification, or exit conditions visible.

Go directly to the builder ↓

Frame one comparison

Nothing entered here is transmitted to Aloha AI. Do not paste confidential, privileged, personal, security-sensitive, or regulated information.

Restoring your local comparison… Jump to download and reset controls ↓

Gates control.A high weighted score never cancels an unresolved or failed gate.
01Criterion weights

Weight each criterion from 0–5 before comparing. Arithmetic organizes your judgments; it does not make them objective.

02Current process
Do not advance5 gate(s) failed or unresolved. Repair and obtain required review before ranking controls a decision.

Privacy, data authority, and acceptable use

The information, permissions, retention, model-training terms, and uses are lawful and acceptable for this bounded context.

Security and incident response

Required security controls, vulnerability handling, incident notice, and responsible ownership are evidenced.

Accessibility and equitable access

The option can meet applicable access needs, accommodations, and procurement requirements without shifting burdens to users.

Evidence and output verification

Claims and outputs can be tested against trusted sources by capable reviewers before consequential use.

Exit, portability, and continuity

Data and work can be retrieved; lock-in, deletion, transition, and service-failure paths are understood and acceptable.

Bounded task fit

Does the option support the stated outcome within scope?

Operational fit

Can the responsible team review, maintain, support, and govern it?

Total burden

Consider money, implementation, review, training, remediation, switching, and ongoing work.

0% weighted arithmetic summary (0/50). This summary is not comparable unless the same scope, evidence standard, reviewers, and weights apply—and it never overrides a gate.

03Candidate A
Do not advance5 gate(s) failed or unresolved. Repair and obtain required review before ranking controls a decision.

Privacy, data authority, and acceptable use

The information, permissions, retention, model-training terms, and uses are lawful and acceptable for this bounded context.

Security and incident response

Required security controls, vulnerability handling, incident notice, and responsible ownership are evidenced.

Accessibility and equitable access

The option can meet applicable access needs, accommodations, and procurement requirements without shifting burdens to users.

Evidence and output verification

Claims and outputs can be tested against trusted sources by capable reviewers before consequential use.

Exit, portability, and continuity

Data and work can be retrieved; lock-in, deletion, transition, and service-failure paths are understood and acceptable.

Bounded task fit

Does the option support the stated outcome within scope?

Operational fit

Can the responsible team review, maintain, support, and govern it?

Total burden

Consider money, implementation, review, training, remediation, switching, and ongoing work.

0% weighted arithmetic summary (0/50). This summary is not comparable unless the same scope, evidence standard, reviewers, and weights apply—and it never overrides a gate.

04Candidate B
Do not advance5 gate(s) failed or unresolved. Repair and obtain required review before ranking controls a decision.

Privacy, data authority, and acceptable use

The information, permissions, retention, model-training terms, and uses are lawful and acceptable for this bounded context.

Security and incident response

Required security controls, vulnerability handling, incident notice, and responsible ownership are evidenced.

Accessibility and equitable access

The option can meet applicable access needs, accommodations, and procurement requirements without shifting burdens to users.

Evidence and output verification

Claims and outputs can be tested against trusted sources by capable reviewers before consequential use.

Exit, portability, and continuity

Data and work can be retrieved; lock-in, deletion, transition, and service-failure paths are understood and acceptable.

Bounded task fit

Does the option support the stated outcome within scope?

Operational fit

Can the responsible team review, maintain, support, and govern it?

Total burden

Consider money, implementation, review, training, remediation, switching, and ongoing work.

0% weighted arithmetic summary (0/50). This summary is not comparable unless the same scope, evidence standard, reviewers, and weights apply—and it never overrides a gate.

05Preserve uncertainty and ownership

Why gates come before ranking

NIST separates governance, context, measurement, and management; its AI RMF also calls for documented roles, impacts, and ongoing review. NIST, CISA, and the U.S. Access Board provide official software-security, secure-by-design, and accessibility expectations. This builder turns those themes into questions and an evidence record. It does not certify a product or supplier.