Should a small law firm use AI to summarize prospective-client intake? This page records the prepared RN-led edition and its honest boundary: the teaching system exists, but it has not received final RN approval or completed real delivery-environment testing, so enrollment and booking remain closed.
Evaluate one fictional workflow without inventing evidence.
The prepared edition is for small-firm owners, operations leads, supervising lawyers, legal technologists, and implementation advisers. It does not give legal advice, endorse a product, claim a universal safe configuration, authorize a pilot, or request real client or prospective-client information.
Current evidence disposition
The release candidate teaches with the fully fictional Harborlight case, a deterministic Evaluation Card, and general or model authority that remains expressly noncontrolling. No jurisdiction, real firm, product configuration, empirical benchmark, or live workflow has been validated. The prepared model therefore continues human-led work while identifying the separate evidence and authorization a bounded pilot review would require.
Prepared release candidate
The large teaching package is real.
These artifacts are complete enough for controlled RN review and rehearsal. They are not yet approved public downloads or proof that a live session can be sold and delivered.
01
Polished teaching deck
A 36-slide editable release-candidate deck with slide-specific timing, narration notes, source boundaries, and fictional-case labels.
Prepared02
Verbatim RN script
A complete word-for-word 60-minute teaching script. RN supplies every example, answer, transition, and conclusion; delivery never depends on audience participation.
Prepared03
RN move sheet
Slide-by-slide advance, reveal, pause, reset, timing-recovery, failure, and protected-close cues for one controlled solo-RN delivery.
Prepared04
Synthetic Harborlight case
A complete fictional law-firm intake scenario, supporting artifacts, traps, disconfirming evidence, alternative outcome, model reasoning, and answer key.
Prepared05
Intake Evaluation Card
A ten-section decision instrument with fail-closed logic, four bounded outcomes, a completed fictional model, and no legal-clearance output.
Prepared06
Participant files
Editable workbook, blank card, case handout, held model answer, follow-up materials, and accessible HTML, DOCX, and print-PDF candidates.
Prepared07
Evidence and control records
Claim ledger, official-source dossier, legal-review handoff, rights and text-alternative register, controlled-change log, and blocker register.
Prepared08
Delivery support
Setup, shutdown, accessibility, failure, follow-up, transcript, caption, and platform-test materials prepared for execution.
Prepared09
Release controls
Static QA and a versioned approval package. These controls document readiness; they do not substitute for RN review, rehearsal, or real-environment testing.
Prepared
RN-controlled teaching arc
RN teaches the entire class.
Participants may listen or reflect privately, but RN never waits for an answer, calls on anyone, requests a disclosure, or needs audience input to complete the lesson.
0–6
State the bounded question
RN defines the proposed intake-summary use and the limits of the session.
Segment 16–14
Separate duties, authority, and uncertainty
RN explains the general professional-responsibility frame without presenting it as jurisdiction-specific legal advice.
Segment 214–23
Map the fictional workflow
RN walks through Harborlight’s supplied facts, handoffs, source record, and failure points.
Segment 323–31
Inspect evidence and configuration gaps
RN demonstrates why vendor language, assumptions, and tested facts must remain separate.
Segment 431–43
Complete the fictional Evaluation Card
RN works the card aloud, supplies every answer, and shows why blockers cannot be overridden.
Segment 543–53
Compare the model and alternative outcome
RN reveals the prepared reasoning, misconceptions, disconfirming fact, safeguards, and stop conditions.
Segment 653–60
Record the bounded disposition
RN states Outcome C, the next evidence required, the owner, the review trigger, and the protected close.
Segment 7
Evaluation Card outcomes
The instrument cannot output “legal clearance.”
Reject the proposed use.
Redesign the workflow and retest.
Continue human-led work.
Seek separate authorization for a bounded pilot review.
The prepared Harborlight model produces “continue human-led work.” Text presence never equals evidence, uncertainty defaults to restraint, and no blocker can silently disappear.
Current release decision
Prepared for RN review. Not available to book.
The content and production package are substantial and specific: deck, complete narration, every teaching move, case, instrument, participant files, evidence controls, captions, and delivery plans. What remains cannot honestly be replaced by an agent checking a box—it requires RN judgment, authorized reviewers, and execution in the actual delivery environment.
No live seat, reservation, checkout, Clinic, or participant download is available from this page.